高级检索

中国输电线路规范的风荷载计算比较

Comparison of Wind Load Calculation for China Transmission Codes

  • 摘要:
      目的  在台风袭击下,一些20世纪80、90年代建设的110 kV和220 kV输电线路经常出现铁塔损坏的现象,为了加固和改造事故线路,需要分析铁塔损坏的原因。
      方法  介绍了中国1979、1990、2002和2012四个版本规定的输电线路风荷载计算方法,比较了设计风速、风压高度变化系数、体型系数、风荷载调整系数和覆冰风荷载增大系数等主要计算参数的差异,计算了某铁塔节段和导线在四个版本规定中的风荷载。
      结果  计算结果表明:12规定的设计风速相比79、90和02规定增大5%~10%;79规程中60 m以下铁塔不考虑风振系数的规定严重低估了塔身风荷载;四本规定中110 kV和220 kV输电线路不采用导地线风荷载调整系数的规定严重低估了导地线风荷载。
      结论  各规定的铁塔和线条风荷载差异的主要影响因素是风速重现期、铁塔或导地线风荷载调整系数,这也是风灾倒塔的主要原因。

     

    Abstract:
      Introduction  Several towers of some 110 kV or 220 kV transmission lines built in 1980s and 1990s were destroyed under typhoon strike. The reasons of towers collapse shall be analyzed for reinforce and rebuild transmission lines.
      Method  Wind load calculation formula of transmission line for 1979, 1990, 2002 and 2012 China code were introduced. The differences of wind speed, height variation factor of wind pressure, shape factor, adjustment coefficient of wind load and icing load factor were compared, wind load of a tower section and conductor for four edition China codes were calculated.
      Result  The results show that the 12 code's design wind speed is 5%~10% greater than that of 79, 90 and 02 code, the 79 code's tower wind load for tower height under 60 m is underestimated without considering adjustment coefficient of wind load and 1979, 1990, 2002 and 2012 code's wire wind load of 110 kV or 220 kV transmission lines are seriously underestimated without considering adjustment coefficient of wind load.
      Conclusion  The difference of 79, 90, 02 and 12 code's wind load for tower and wire is mainly affected by wind speed return period and adjustment coefficient of wind load, which are main reasons for tower collapse.

     

/

返回文章
返回